Arguments Against the Death Penalty

Authors

  • Sumana Gadiraju

Keywords:

Capital punishment, Criminal justice reform, Racial bias, Public policy

Abstract

Sumana Gadiraju presents a comprehensive argument against the death penalty, critiquing it from historical, moral, legal, racial, and financial standpoints. The article explores the origins and evolution of capital punishment, revealing its deep entanglement with systemic discrimination and unequal application, particularly against communities of color. Gadiraju highlights inconsistencies in sentencing, the lack of reliable deterrence, and the exorbitant financial costs involved in administering the death penalty. Through a wide range of sources—from classical legal theorists like Cesare Beccaria to modern statistical analyses—the paper calls for the abolition of capital punishment and promotes life imprisonment without parole as a more equitable alternative.

Author Biography

Sumana Gadiraju

Sumana Gadiraju graduated summa cum laude from Rutgers
in 2022 with a B.S. in Biology and minors in Psychology and
Chemistry. While in school, Sumana served in a number of
student leadership positions and was actively involved in
community-based service and volunteerism. Through this
paper, which discusses capital punishment in both a historical
and modern context, Sumana aims to bring attention to
various ethical, practical, and financial implications of the
death penalty. This is her second published work at Rutgers.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-25

How to Cite

Gadiraju, S. (2025). Arguments Against the Death Penalty. The Rutgers-Camden Undergraduate Review, 2(2), 10. Retrieved from https://rcur.libraries.rutgers.edu/index.php/rcur/article/view/2226